COMPARISON DARBY / LOUIS SEGOND ...
(Preached on Sunday November 02, 2003 morning in Locodjoro, Abidjan - Ivory Coast)
[Ed: the Louis Segond bible does not exist in English, so in this preaching the verses taken from it have been literally translated]
Since 2002, when I began to preach the revelation on the Bible, some cunning pastors and prophets being in contact with the Message began to recommend Darby in their churches instead of coming and accept the Message. However, they can change their bibles and doctrines, but they will not be able to change the most important which is the spirit of divination that will send them into hell. You see? And since 2003, hundreds of pages have been sent on the Internet over the world. And we are seeing more and more pastors, prophets and evangelists with Darby. They put their big canaries of fetishes Louis Segond, Scofield, Thompson, King James down... Also, I believe that, the demons of divination that we chase away from here can go and reveal it to them in order to confuse the source. Some also see that it's the truth but by accepting what will it cost them? ... Remember Matth.8:28-34, Jesus had delivered two fathers who returned to their homes. This had to be a celebration in honour of Jesus, but when people saw that it had cost them a herd of pigs, they didn’t want it, they chased Jesus away...
Well, there are many truths but only one Truth, there are many gods but only one is the true God. There are many churches but only one is the true Church. There are many holy spirits but only one is the true Holy Spirit. There are many versions of the Bible but only one is the true version.
Know that on this point of the Message, a great contradiction is thrown on earth. They will tell me: "What about those who do not have the Darby version in their language?" Don’t be afraid! I do not want to take the Bible away from you. I do not know how but the Darby version will be translated into other languages. For 1500 years, your fathers had no Bible but they lived Christianity better than you. Those who publish the Darby version, instead of trying to translate it into other languages, they seek how to revise it. All those who have corrected versions in the history were powerful preachers, full of the Spirit. Not a group of scholars ... The ancient Hebrew is no longer spoken and it’s the most difficult language to be, without vowel but they can translate the Darby version into other languages such as one day, this Message will be translated into languages that I do not understand! You see? That's what they should do. After all, I do not believe in any revision. The evolution of languages orders explanatory notes at the foot of page, not a revision. Languages will always progress. Thus, according to the grace that has been granted to me, I consider now that, from this ministry of Matth.25:6 and Rev.12:14, owning a version of bible that the Spirit condemns is an act of rebellion. And also having the Darby version that I recommended and staying away from what God is doing does not change anything. There is no salvation except in what God is doing.
Well! In Isaiah 35:8-9 it’s the way that is holy and not the road. In Judges 17:1-5, it’s question of gods (idols) and not God. Read up to Judges 18:23-24 where Louis Segond acknowledges that it’s question of "gods". In Exodus 32:4, Louis Segond acknowledges that a calf of gold is a god and in 1 Kings 12:28, he writes "God" for calves of gold.
In Ezekiel 2:1; 3:1, 4:1, ... it’s question of "Son of man" that is to say prophet not "The Son of man" which refers to Jesus Christ, The Supreme Prophet as in Matth.16:13. Also, in Ezekiel 3:12 and 14 as in Rev.14:13, it is question of the Spirit of God, then "S" in upper case as in Ez.8:3.
In Gen 1:2; 1Sam.16:4; Isaiah 61:1 ... "S" should be in upper case when it’s question of God. But the real reason why Louis Segond writes "the [s]pirit" of God with "s" is that, for him, there is a good spirit of God and an evil spirit of God. I do not believe in that doctrine. And that is unveiled in 1Samuel 18:10. Louis Segond says: "... The evil spirit of God came upon Saul." while Darby says: "... an evil spirit from Jehovah was upon Saul." It is the same with 1Sam.19:9.
In Matth.24: 24, "C" of false Christs must be in lowercase [Ed: in French] because it is not the true Holy Spirit but spirits of divination, that would act as holy spirit. Thus "false christs" not "false Christs".[Ed: in French (faux christs # faux Christs)]
In Rev.1:4 it is "Spirits" because it is the Holy Spirit within seven dispensations.
Withdrawal of "firstborn son" in Matth.1: 25 to say that Mary had no other children after Jesus. It’s on purpose that they did all these things for doctrinal reasons.
The lowercase of christ or lord Jesus especially in the New Testament ... responds to the Greek language which does not admit upper case but when the word takes the meaning of proper name.
Matth.4:10 ... do homage is the literal translation of the Greek word proskïneo.
In Rev.1:20, it’s question of seven golden lamp (a candlestick) and not seven candlesticks that give forty-nine lamps; the same for Rev.11:4.
In John 17:11: "I come to thee" not "I go to thee" because the Father is in Him; likewise in verse 12, it is question of "thy name which thou hast given me"
In Daniel 5:25, Louis Segond does not mention the writing that was drawn on the wall: "Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin!". Remember that there Upharsin is the plural of Peres.
In Daniel 9:25-27, there is confusion in the translation on "the 70 weeks of Daniel" as Micah 1:10-15 that Louis Segond had trouble translating it. Darby says in Micah 1:10:" ... at Beth-le-aphrah roll thyself in the dust." Louis Segond says: "...I roll myself in the dust at Beth-Leaphra." You see?
In Matth.24: 28, it is question of "eagles" and not "vultures". It's also worth specifying that the Louis Segond versions do not have the same content ... The translator being incapable to understand all the languages of the earth, a man having the Spirit should translate for example Darby into Portuguese, Spanish, ... because the most important is that it should be done in the language of the messenger and by the grace of God, it is the case.
In Rev.1:10, it is question of "day"(Sunday) [Ed: in French (journée # jour)] and not "day" that may refer to the prophetic day that is a thousand years. But the millennium alone is one thousand years.
In Genesis 4:15, it is the killer of Cain who will be punished seven times, not Cain who will be avenged seven times. Darby says: "And Jehovah said to him, Therefore, whoever slayeth Cain, it shall be revenged sevenfold ..." Louis Segond says: "Jehovah said to him: If someone killed Cain, Cain would be avenged seven times ...". It is not the same thing. And in Genesis 4:23, 24, the theologian Lemech interpreted it in his favor in order to shed blood as his great-grandfather Cain.
Matth.11: 23: "hades* " is not necessarily "the dwelleth of the dead" because there is on the one hand the hades* which is the place of torments and on the other hand the bosom of Abraham.
In Hebr.13:17 Louis Segond says: "Obey your leaders and have for them the greatest respect, for they watch OVER your souls ...". But the Bible says that there is only one who watches OVER our souls and also OVER the souls of the leaders it’s God! [Ed: French Darby version literally says: “they watch for your souls…”; that’s what is meant here]
1 Cor.11:15 ends with a full stop (not a question mark) to conclude that the long hair is the veil of woman. Committees that reviewed Louis Segond recognized it. In Rom.16:1 it is not question of "deaconess" but "servant". The verse 2 shows it. She was in aid of the saints, that’s what she did.
Rev.12:18 is part of the first paragraph of chapter 13 and also it is not: "It stood" but "I stood..." because it is not question of the dragon but John.
The same work on Louis Segond has also been done for King James, Ostervald, David Martin versions... because each one of these versions prevails in a place of the world. There are countries where, even among evangelicals, Louis Segond is unknown. Satan has done a substantive piece of work and people do not know it. You see? Similarly, Louis Segond has undergone many revisions what has never been the case for Darby. Yet we know that it’s because the thing is not good that it is revised. Also, the reviewing committees did not keep the paragraphs that are in the Hebrew and Greek originals. And a multitude of verses has been added for harmony.
I point out that the Scofield and Thompson versions are by-products, derivatives of the Louis Segond version. With regard to the king James version (king James), when king James IV of Scotland occupied the throne of England under the name of James I, he asked the fifty four best interpreters of London, both pagan and religious, to make a translation that bears his name, a way to win the favor of Christians. It's as if they gave the whole world an excellent version called: Fidel Castro version or even Emperor Bokassa I version.
However, the first element of contradiction is: "Louis Segond, Doctor of Theology" [Ed: doctor of divinity] on the front page of that bible. Accepting that, it’s to accept theology because if I know that fetishism is not good, how can I read a bible translated by a fetish priest and having on its front page: " Zérédji Translation, great fetish priest" even if it is well done? Here at least, I praise evangelicals and protestants for condemning catholics, they do not use the Tob bible. Evangelicals and theologians will stand at the judgment to condemn branhamists. You see? Branhamists want to show to the mankind that the worthless tree of theology that William Branham condemned can produce good fruits. And they will answer for that before God.
If a member of an evangelical church does not know why the Louis Segond, King James bibles and others are of the devil, I beg you to explain that carefully to begin with theology to come to comparisons of verses. But if some branhamists, sons of Belial dispute this Message, it is due to ill faith or pride otherwise he is a sorcerer because he cannot say that he does not understand...
With regard to the divisions of the Bible into chapters and verses, first in the century IX, Masoretes (rabbis and Jewish scholars) inserted figures in the margins of the rolls of the Old Testament leaving paragraphs compact, complete and intact. Then in the century XIII, two people: a Spanish cardinal named Hugo and English archbishop named Langton divided the first translations into chapters. It was in 1520 that Sanctès Pagnin had placed figures in the margin of his Latin translation as in the Hebrew rolls after the example of the Darby version, without distinction of paragraphs. But in 1551, Robert Estienne in his English translation of the New Testament published in Geneva, made it as Louis Segond, breaking the text into verses and each verse into paragraph, destroying thus the paragraphs of the Hebrew and Greek rolls. Robert Estienne did it for his publication of the Vulgate published in 1555. And this diabolical system was first adopted by the clergy of France and major evangelical movements of the time. It’s in that way that by Darby, we know that Rev.12:18 is the first verse of Rev.13. "[Rev.12:18:] And I stood upon the sand of the sea;[Rev.13:1:] and I saw a beast rising out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and upon its horns ten diadems, and upon its heads names of blasphemy". And in Darby, the asterisks mark the beginnings of chapter in the Hebrew originals. Thus, Genesis 2:4 is the beginning of the chapter 2 of Genesis and it is the case in the entire Bible. You see that Gen.2:1 says: "Thus were finished ...". You see this is the beginning of the conclusion of the chapter 1 ...
According to history, John Nelson Darby was born in London in 1800 to an Irish father. He is of Irish descent like William Branham. After heavy studies of law at the University of Dublin (Ireland), he becomes lawyer before giving up the bar to follow the Lord. Like Wesley in 1725, he was deacon of a small anglican church in 1825 then pastor the following year in the region of Wicklow in Ireland before resigning after several disagreements with his superiors. After intense studies of lawyer, the only thing Darby studied, it is languages so that he spoke Ancient Hebrew and Greek as his mother tongue. Studying languages, it’s not theology! Subsequently, his friend JG Bellet, also a lawyer, joined him. Ever since, leaned only upon the Holy Spirit, Darby began to preach in the villages and countrysides from Ireland, across Europe, Asia and America, condemning the organisation of the church, the presidency of church by man, luxury, theology and demonstrating already that "Jesus Christ is the Jehovah of the Old Testament" calling all churches to return to the foundation of the Apostles and prophets. Darby spoke English, French, Hebrew, Greek, German and Italian. He translated the New and Old Testament in around 1859 before the one Louis Segond translated at the request of the company of pastors of Geneva. The Darby version exceeded thus that of King James that king James requested they made in his name, and which was made in 1611, which version had prevailed over two centuries and which was the renewal of that of William Tyndall. King James himself had approved 47 scholars, powerful interpreters to whom must be added a certain number of Jewish rabbis who had the best manuscripts and the whole divided into three big groups. A group at Cambridge University, another group at Oxford, and the last group at Westminster. And each group was also divided into two small groups. Six groups in all. The first group finished and passed the work to the second that passed it to the next ... but despite that, there were fourteen corrections before the first publication of King James in 1611. But each of them mastered Hebrew more than any Jew. And it was said of one of the translators of that King James bible, that he was so skilled in all languages, mainly those of the East, that had he been present at the confusion of tongues at the time of the tower of Babel, he could have served as an interpreter. You see? And the great- great-grandfather of such a man was builder of the tower of Babel and now his great-grand-son is a builder of a new tower of Babel called "King James bible" in this Eden of Satan. But the providence of God made that Darby, only one man rose up on behalf of God to translate the Bible. Does the Almighty God need fifty-four scholars to translate the Bible? Does God deal with the clever? ...
The Darby version also surpassed that of the powerful theologian Ostervald which is from a revision of the philosopher and theologian David Martin [at the request of the Synod of the walloon churches] on the bible Lemaistre de Sacy. [Note: I discovered in June 2005, John Nelson Darby had gone further in interpreting the mysteries of the Bible, indicating already in the 19th century that the 24 elders around the throne were the whole of the 12 Apostles and the 12 patriarchs, that Genesis 1:27 does not apply to angels ...].
The only Bible on earth that imposed itself and that has never been retouched or revised even by Darby himself and that has not been a renewal or a translation from another version is the version of the lawyer John Nelson Darby. And I would like the French version to serve as the basis for translations into other languages with notes on the obsolete words and phrases. And I had the revelation that it’s the Bible of the Bride before having these pieces of information. Darby died on April 29, 1882 and here are his last words:" God be blessed, I do not have anything to withdraw, and very little to add. I have nothing to add except my sincere gratitude and thankful affection in Him." (Letter of March 19, 1882). May these words also be mine at the end of this Message and may I be granted as well as you who have believed, the laurels of victory and we rest upon that! [Ed: the congregation shouts "Amen!"]. I said what I saw and what God has commanded me to say like Moses, Paul ... I have been called in a supernatural way and I served as them, if they enter, we will also enter [Ed: the congregation says, Amen!]. It's infallible!
The three best-known manuscripts that gather almost the canon, the whole of the recognized books of the Old and New Testament are: the Sinaiticus discovered in the 4th century in the monastery of St. Catherine, Mount Sinai. It contains the Old and New Testament entirely; today preserved in the British Museum of London. Then comes the Alexandrinus discovered in the 5th century in Alexandria in Egypt, it contains the Old Testament and mysteriously, the New Testament starts with Matth.25:6. [See bible encyclopedia by Frank-Reece Reisdorf]. For us, it is not a coincidence. Then in 3rd place, the Vaticanus, of unknown origin, without value, does not contain 1 and 2 Timothy, Philemon, Titus and Revelation. It is preserved in the Vatican. We reckon that this manuscript assigned to Africans and starting with Matth.25: 6 is a prophetic sign. And here is a report of theologians according to the same encyclopedia, on the same page: "The first protestant version, was that of Olivetan (1535). It was corrected by Calvin (1550) and later by T.de Bèze and edited by Cornelius Bertram (Geneva 1588). Since, it has been revised by David Martin (1707) and John Frederick Ostervald. All these versions are now replaced by those of Louis Segond (Geneva 1874 and Oxford 1880), the one said Synodal (revised in 1926), and the one we believe the most faithful to the original text, that of J. N. Darby". I specify that the King James version was translated by a group yet God does not deal with a group! And a complete revision of King James took place in 1881. Before the midnight Cry, that was not known but now it is known, do not reason! Get that as a commandment of God. God said in Matth.25:6 and Rev.12:14 that a short Message will come to take the elect away from the face of the serpent: away from these catholic, protestant, evangelical and branhamist churches... away from the holy spirit that acts in these churches. ... away from these Osborn, Ushe Praise, Morris Cerullo, Yonggi Cho, ... away from the Next Generation Alliance, Carlos Annacondia, Paul Ayoh, Benjamin Boni, Jean-Baptiste Nielbien, Bernard Agré, ... away from the bookstores and media called Christians, ... away from the unions and federations of churches, ... [away from the canaries of fetishes that you call Louis Segond, King James, Tob, Martin, Scofield Bibles] ... away from the prophets that go over the earth and ,this Message that is the two wings of the great Eagle of Rev.12:14 must take the elect to the desert. Stay away from them! For there is no salvation outside of that. Recognizing the day and its Message!
Let’s bow our heads! "You who are here for the first time, after having heard this Message, is there someone who believes It entirely and who would like to accept It? ... If so, let him simply raise the hand "... You must do it freely because our desire is not that God transforms crabs into fish! If He does it, it would be nice, there will be plenty of fish here, but fish with behaviors of crab and we will have all the problems afterward ... If he says I will buy a Darby Bible but I will remain in my church, leave him !You see? It is a crab. Well, does somebody want to accept this Message? ... And if there is none, we are going to ... [Ed: Someone raises the hand] Brother, may God bless you! Yes, brother there! Sister God bless you ... Keep your hands raised while I pray for you! May God bless you there! May God bless you here ...
Lord Jesus Christ, I pray that in this engagement, you support these souls! Their decision will be tested by the devil and we will not be there to support them but we recommend them to Your divine grace! ... And then we have finished the worship of this morning, I recommend every brother and sister into Your hands so that separated, from body, we be always united in the same Spirit and faith away from sin until we meet again! Lord, make us strong and give us victory over sin and the devil and may the honour, glory and magnificence be due to You for ages and ages, Amen!
|
