If it is not by idolatry, the minimum wisdom should allow any chosen one to recognize not only the enemy of outside but the enemy of inside as Judas was, despite his authentic call. And I cannot understand how Ewald Frank made himself an enemy of God and of Salvation from the earliest moments after William Branham died. I do not understand how a little preacher was not afraid to lay his hands on what God has already completed, even if an angel came from heaven to ask him to do so. If someone were to do so, it should not be Ewald Frank ... did not God see brethren FF Bosworth, Ern Baxter, Wood, Schoeman, Preller, Sothman, Perry Green, or even Billy Paul who were all with William Branham and residing in the U.S.A? If William Branham was present, could Ewald Frank diffuse those circular letters, brochures and books added to the Message? And which punishment do you think God will have in store for him at the judgment, he and those who are following him? These sorcerers in sheep’s coats who know nothing about God. After some preachings of William Branham, brother Neville or someone came and dismiss the audience often with inspiring words that he never allowed to be put on the tapes or in brochures even if it is brother Neville, or even prophecies. All this has not been a lesson to Frank and Alexis Barilier through whom God also speaks as it was the case of Korah and Dathan ... Yet the Louis Segond version reports that it is question of seven golden candlesticks in Rev.1: 20 and William Branham said it is rather question of seven golden lamps. Seven lamps but one candlestick, only one Church. Furthermore, in an interview with them, one of them told me that he had the Greek original of Revelation and that it is question of seven golden candlesticks! You see? Jesus did say "in the name of the Father, of the Son and of the Holy Spirit" and it is written. But it was by the Holy Spirit that Peter said "in the name of Jesus Christ" and we believe it, it is revelation that makes difference between the children of the Kingdom and those of this world.
Ewald Frank corrects, contradicts William Branham saying that God was talking to angels when He said " Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. " However a man has nothing in common with an angel. In Rev.5, although an angel is sinless, he could not take the Book of redemption because he is not a relative of man. Has man got wings? Is an angel male or female? When you read Gen.1:26-27, what does Colossians 1:15 say? Who is the image of the invisible God? If a man does not have an occult purpose, he cannot link a man to an angel. God was talking to Himself with regard to the attributes that He would manifest. He created the man spirit as He Himself is Spirit. He created him body as He Himself would manifest Himself in a body on earth. He took Eve from the side of Adam for on the cross, the Bride would be taken from His side. You see? If the angels are in man’s image, so the blood of Jesus will redeem demons! ... Be it on the thunders, on the seventy weeks of Daniel, Ewald Frank has revealed all but the image of an expert seducer forged to pervert the way of the Truth. And whoever has understood this Message will see that what natural Germany did to Jews, it is what she has done to the Christians over the whole world through her son Ewald Frank without any hand being able to stop him. You see? When William Branham spoke of the distribution of food, he did not know that he was dealing with a founder of golden calf ... and they are thousands of souls that that witchcraft and his brotherhood slaughter per country. You see? The humble Aaron, founder of golden calf! And the two tables, the two wings of the great Eagle will smite the golden calf. I'm not saying that he will absolutely go into hell because there were popes who repented ... And it was through him that the entire earth received the evening Light. But at any rate, he revealed too much Satanism. How has he been able to support Rev.10:7 since 1966 and make a sudden change at last? Was it not by the "Thus saith the Lord" that William Branham relied upon Rev.10:7 during all his ministry? If William Branham is not Rev.10:7 then he is a false prophet! You see? For the wise, Ewald Frank has already said that William Branham is a false prophet but the wicked of Daniel 12:10, those to whom God has not given wisdom do not understand. But if God keeps Ewald Frank for some more years and gives him enough courage, he will declare it. Follow him closely; he will declare that some day! But for us, he has already declared it. If you do not understand me, I will give an example: When Jesus says He came on earth in pursuance of Isaiah 61, if after this, an apostle comes to say that Jesus Christ is a true prophet, his miracles are authentic, and such and such and such things are true, all he did is true, all he said is true, BUT ONLY HE IS NOT ISAIAH 61, that is to say that Jesus Christ is a false prophet. [Ed: the congregation says, Amen!]. That's what Frank Ewald means and that people do not understand. When John the Baptist says he came on earth in pursuance of Isaiah 40:3, if someone comes to say afterwards that John the Baptist was a true prophet, but only he is not Isaiah 40, that is to say that John the Baptist is a false prophet. [Ed: the congregation says, Amen!]. Imagine that one day a brother comes to say that Kacou Philip is a true prophet but Matth.25: 6 does not apply to his ministry, then no matter all I did, will I not simply be a seducer? Do you understand? [Ed: the congregation says, Amen!]. ... And a brother showed me a book or a circular letter in which Ewald Frank says that now God reveals his word through doctors and theologians. The Bible says let such a man be cursed! [...] He is telling branhamists that the evening time is now past. But if you acknowledge that the evening time is past, tell them also that the evening Message is the adjourned manna and that it is the midnight Message they must eat! The evening Message now serves us as foundation according to Rev.12: 1. [Ed: the congregation says, Amen!].
My birth certificate reads: Kacou Philip, born on December 30, 1972 at 6 am in Katadji in the sub-prefecture of Sikensi. But according to my mother, I was born very early in the morning, five days before Christmas! Not five days after Christmas. At the same time, E. Frank, Barilier and Baranowski were in the Ivory Coast, Sikensi [see photo and note of the circular letter of January 1973]. And they all know that angels sang very early in the morning in Sikensi in those days. Witnesses who saw the event reveal that it is in Katadji that the event had taken place. And that was seen in other villages such as Sikensi which is three kilometers away from Katadji. And far from exaggerating, the place where, they say, the song was first located covers also our poor mud house. My parents who have no notion of the spiritual did not feel concerned by the event. You see? The midnight Cry which is a celestial and world event deserves that. And it is in this small village that the evening Message was first mentioned in the Ivory Coast? Names like Jacques Ayoh should recall you something ...
Well! In the vision of April 24, the assemblies of the Message were represented by a mixed race woman! There was a mixture of seeds. On the hand we have thunderists and on the other hand para-thunderists. Clans all around. Some look toward Switzerland and Germany and others look toward the U.S. and Jeffersonville. In the anticipated vision of the Bride, you remember the countries of origin of three young girls who broke step: Switzerland, ... the 3rd one is from the USA. It is from them that the disorder started propagating and that the evening Message was crucified. Yet prophetically, it must be so in order that the virgins of the 7th eve may fall asleep expecting the midnight Cry that the elect are expecting after the evening time Message. I have talked about these things in details in various preachings.
And I repeat that if today an assembly of the evening Message as the one in Krefeld or Jeffersonville rose up to say: "Hallelujah! The awakening of the Bride has started here!" That would be a seduction for the Bible does say that one of the virgins woke up and awoke the others, but it was a cry, a Preaching that would do it. And any cry or sound of trumpet brought about an exodus.
[...] That venomous being crawling in the bush is a pure relative of the members of these churches, flesh for flesh, bone for bone. They should have a good thought whenever a snake is killed, but I see they are all ignorant about this. Yet, before the curse struck their ancestor in Gen.3: 14, their human form had already escaped in the person of Cain. This is the pure truth and I challenge the scientists of the earth to show me that the DNA test on the blood of snakes and the blood of all those who are opposing this Message reveals no affinity.
And like the old bishop Polycarp, not by boldness but by conviction, I call Ewald Frank, Branham’s children and all their followers and all the branhamists to this Message. If possible, let Joseph and Billy Paul Branham show me they are Joseph and Billy Paul and not Hophni and Phinehas, the sons of Eli ... You see? Otherwise, at least, after you have heard me, I invite you to humility so that the same God who spoke by William Branham and who is here at midnight may reveal himself to you. And my prayer is that He reveals Himself to you! ...
back to the list